INTRODUCTION:

The higher education sector in Telangana has undergone significant transformation since the state’s formation in 2014. With the establishment of numerous institutions, including both central and state universities, Telangana has aimed to increase access to higher education, promote equity among its diverse population, and improve the overall quality of its academic offerings. However, despite these efforts, substantial challenges remain in achieving these goals uniformly across different demographics and regions within the state. Access, equity, and quality are foundational pillars in any higher education system. Access refers to the availability of educational opportunities to all segments of the population, ensuring that individuals from various socioeconomic, geographic, and cultural backgrounds can enrol in institutions. Equity ensures that access does not remain a theoretical concept but is accompanied by measures to include marginalized groups, including women, minorities, and economically disadvantaged communities. Quality, on the other hand, is tied to academic rigor, infrastructure, faculty qualifications, research opportunities, and the employability of graduates. The balance between these three dimensions is essential for creating an inclusive, effective, and globally competitive higher education system.

Telangana higher education landscape, comprising prestigious institutions like Osmania University, University of Hyderabad, The English and Foreign Languages University and recently established state universities, reflects a complex interplay of these factors. While enrolment rates have increased, concerns around inequities persist, especially when comparing urban and rural areas, central versus state universities, and the experiences of marginalized groups. Additionally, questions about the quality of education, faculty shortages, infrastructure gaps, and the role of technology in learning environments add to the complexity of these challenges. The current study seeks to explore the emerging challenges related to access, equity, and quality in Telangana’s higher education sector, using a comparative lens between central and state universities. It aims to investigate not only the quantitative aspects, such as enrolment rates and faculty numbers, but also qualitative dimensions, such as inclusivity in academic spaces, the effectiveness of government policies, and how prepared graduates are for the workforce. By examining these aspects, the study aims to contribute to the discourse on improving higher education systems to make them more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable for future generations.

Important Role in The Process of Development:

Higher education plays an important role in the process of development of a country. Higher education plays an important role in the process of development of a country. It acquires more significance in the context of a developing country like India with 28 States at various levels of development. The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) felt that higher education in India made a significant contribution to economic development, social progress and political democracy in Independent India. It is an important source of dynamism for the economy as it creates wider social and economic opportunities for people and reduces social, economic and regional inequalities. India possesses the third largest higher educational system in the world next to America and China. But the growth of higher educational institutions is uneven among different States, social groups and gender. The policy makers have to take into account the above factors in order to provide equal opportunities to all people in the country and also in the States.

Telangana is the latest addition to the list of total States in the country. It is the youngest State in India but not the poorest when compared to many other States. It is the twelfth largest State in terms of both area and size of the population. Telangana became a reality after a protracted struggle for more than six decades and many sacrifices by the people and unemployed youth. The Telangana movement was basically a people's movement. had the unique character of possessing predominantly weaker sections such as Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Minorities who constitute nearly 90 per cent of the total population. The GER of women in Telangana soared from 34.1 per cent in 2017-18 to 41.6 per cent in 2021-22. Similarly, the GER of men went up by 3.8 per cent from 34.7 per cent to 38.5 per cent during the same time frame, according to the All-India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2021-22. Girl students of Telangana have taken an unprecedented 73% of the total post graduate seats in all the Telangana state universities 2023-2024. Telangana has 60 Govt and Private medical colleges offering a total 9120 MBBS seats ranking it 5^th among all states in India. To fulfil the wishes of these sections, a new model of development which is inclusive is required. Another important feature of Telangana is that more than 50 per cent of its population is below the age of 25 years.

Universities are considered knowledge powerhouses built on intellectual debates and a fair reflection of ideologies across society. Those heading them have, ideally, elite personas and a respect that few others in the society command, but the recent developments in Telangana universities. It has the highest frustrated youth suffering from unemployment. Providing education and employment opportunities to the unskilled, unorganised and illiterate is a very difficult task. Higher education in Telangana is provided predominantly in the public sector and there are more than dozen State universities covering 80 per cent of the total districts in the combined State of Telangana. But technical education is mostly in the private sector. The most disturbing feature of higher education in Telangana is the absence of Vice-Chancellors for more than 11 universities which is a matter of great concern for the stakeholders as the day-to-day administration cannot be provided on proper lives by the in-charges of administration. Hence, appointment of Vice-Chancellors at the earliest to keep the universities on the right track acquires significance. The Vice-Chancellors have to take up the challenges before them very seriously.

A very serious and big agenda is awaiting their arrival. One of the immediate challenges faced by the universities is the absence of full-fledged executive councils which are the top management bodies. Democratic functioning of universities requires the constitution of these bodies for proper policy making. For the past 10 years, important decisions have been taken by the varsities with the truncated executive councils which are legally unacceptable causing damage to the image of the universities. Another major challenge to the universities of Telangana in particular and country in general is recruitment of teaching staff. Available data indicates that around 65 per cent of the faculty positions are vacant in the varsities of Telangana, Overall the Central Universities s have a total vacancy of 32.6%, while IIT and IIMs have 31.5% of the faculty vacancy. India is expected to be the fastest growing economy touching a GDP of USD 7.5 trillion by 2030 and one of the youngest nations in the world with a median age of 32. Projections show that our country would require a gross incremental workforce of 250 million by 2030. FICCI has been playing a proactive role in the Higher Education sector supported by the Higher Education Committee, comprising key representatives from leading Higher Education Institutions/Universities, Industry and the Government.

Total Universities in India. As of January 29, 2024, The total number of universities in India is 1,113 51000 and 34.6 million students the Indian HE boasts of having the largest HE system in the world in terms of institutions and second-largest in terms of enrolment. Government has set a target of 30% GER in higher education by 2020, from the current 24.5%. Indian Higher Education Sector witnesses spending of over Rs 46,200 crore (US$ 6.93 billion) and it is expected to grow at an average annual rate of over 18 % to reach Rs 232,500 crore (US$ 34.87 billion) in next 10 years. However, according to a FICCI estimate, the Indian higher education sector would need up to INR 8,00,000 cr. (USD 133bn) of investment by 2030 to reach 50% GER.

By 2030, with nearly 140 million people in the college going age-group, one in every four graduates in the world will be a product of the Indian Higher Education system. As a nation of young people, India has been bestowed with a demographic advantage - out of a population of above 1.25 billion of which 672 million i.e. almost 50% are in the age-group 15 to 59 years, which is usually treated as the ‘working age population’. India is expected to be the fastest growing economy touching a GDP of USD 7.5 trillion by 2030 and one of the youngest nations in the world with a median age of 32. Projections show that our country would require a gross incremental workforce of 250 million by 2030. The greying developed world is expected to face a skilled talent shortage of approximately 56 million by 2030 and India alone would provide 47 million skilled talent Private sector plays a huge role and accounts for 64% of the total number of institutions and 62% of enrolment. Over 80% of investment in professional education is done by the private sector according ficci report.

The day-to-day workload is carried out by the contract and part-time teachers who are waiting for the arrival of the new Vice-Chancellors for their regularisation and improvement of their livelihoods. It is a more serious matter of concern when compared to other issues of university administration. In the absence of permanent faculty, it is becoming very difficult to appoint Heads, Chairpersons, Board of Studies, Deans and Principals who look after the day-to-day administration. We also cannot think of quality enhancement in higher education Institutions without regular teaching staff. According to a report brought out by NAAC, only 11 per cent of the accredited higher education institutions are of 'A' Grade, 71 per cent are of 'B' Grade and the remaining are of 'C' Grade. If this trend continues, there will be further deterioration of quality of education.

Another important concern before Telangana varsities is the financial crunch. In the absence of regular Vice-Chancellors, universities are also not in a position to attract funds from various agencies like UGC, DST, DBT, RUSA, AICTE etc., which halted the development of universities. Added to this, the Block Grants provided by the State to the varsities are also at pathetic levels adding fuel to the fire. A onetime big push of finances by the State government is a prerequisite for proper nourishment of starving universities. Available data shows that public expenditure on higher education has not improved significantly over the years. Hence, we are unable to compete with other countries. Available evidence shows that RUSA funds are very much unutilised by the State universities as they are not fulfilling the conditions of RUSA due to inadequate permanent staff. A unique feature of Telangana higher education institutions is that a major percentage of them are not yet accredited. Andhra Pradesh and Telangana States are very much lagging behind the other southern States in India with regard to accreditation of colleges. But measurement of quality is an important prerequisite to pull the funds from various agencies. The affiliated colleges under the control of each university must be encouraged and guided by the concerned university towards accreditation. At the State level, a quality control centre may be established by the government to promote quality measurement. Further, the colleges under the jurisdiction of every university must be encouraged to get autonomous states as suggested by the UGC to decrease the administrative burden of universities and concentrate more on academic activities.

Telangana has witnessed growth in both private and public universities in recent years.

Private Universities:

Several new private universities have been established, including:

· Anurag University (2020)

· Mahindra University

· Woxsen University

· Malla Reddy University

· SR University

· Guru Nanak University

· Sreenidhi University

These institutions focus on a variety of disciplines, offering specialized programs in fields like technology, management, and engineering. However, there has been some controversy regarding their exemption from the state's reservation policy in certain programs, which has sparked debate over equitable access The ‘illegally’ admitted students of the Guru Nanak University and Sreenidhi University into engineering and other academic programmes will be accommodated into other private universities and private colleges but the challenges are many before the government.

Public Universities:

On the public front, Telangana continues to support several established universities, including:

· Osmania University

· Kakatiya University

· Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University

· Mahatma Gandhi University

· Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies

Additionally, newer universities like Sri Konda Laxman Telangana State Horticultural University (2014) and P.V. Narasimha Rao Veterinary University (2014) focus on specific sectors like agriculture and veterinary sciences.

The state is also in the process of upgrading its educational infrastructure with projects such as the Young India Skill University, which aims to bridge the gap between academia and industry.

There is growing discontent against government apathy towards the declining state of university education in Telangana. The government must urgently fast track faculty recruitment, support research initiatives and earmark budgets the institutions deserve. The sights of students shouting slogans and protesting at Osmania University and Kakatiya University keep flashing in our minds whenever we think of the struggle for Telangana state. For months together, between 2011 and 2013, the student community kept the police on edge with their protests. These students spearheaded the movement with a hope that in the new state there would be an increase in research and job opportunities. All sections of the society, especially the poor and disadvantaged, elected this government believing that they will get good education and employment but they have been disappointed. When we analyse how we fare in the field of university education three years down the line, we realise that the hopes of people of Telangana went in vain. Out of the total number of posts for professors sanctioned under the direct quota, more than 50 per cent remain vacant. Reduction in the number of admissions in government degree colleges in the current academic year is a fair testimony of how students are afraid of seeking admission in these colleges, which do not have the required number of qualified teaching staff. As the appointments haven’t been made, most universities aren’t able to get the funds and benefits from the University Grants Commission (UGC).

The lack of faculty recruitment over the last 12 years in Telangana raises significant concerns about the strength and quality of universities in the region. Hence, the varsities of Telangana must take into account the unemployed youth and establish skill development centres to improve the employability skills for enhancing employment to remove the frustration among the educated youth. Universities must concentrate on providing suitable jobs based on the qualifications and skills of the students. Simple award of UG, PG and PhD degrees should be slowly stopped by universities and only the courses which can enhance employability of students are to be started by the varsities.

The latest challenge to the varsities of Telangana is competing with private universities which are shortly coming up. The government and the potential Vice-Chancellors of Telangana varsities should prepare the State universities to face this challenge. Otherwise, the GER in State universities will go down and they will face the problem of closure. The Vice-Chancellors and faculty of the State universities, therefore, have to face this situation with boldness and protect the interests of weaker sections of Telangana as they cannot afford to get admission in the elite private universities. Here again appointment of Vice-Chancellors who are searched by the search committees is very important as they have to play leadership role to take the universities to higher academic heights.

Here’s a table summarizing access, equity, and quality in higher education in Telangana between 2014–15 and 2022–23. The data is divided into three categories: enrolment figures, gender equity, and quality indicators (like faculty-student ratio and pass rates).

Analysis:

· Access: Enrolment in higher education has steadily increased, with a noticeable rise in female enrolment, though males still comprise a larger proportion.

· Equity: The gender ratio has slightly improved, and the percentage of female faculty has increased, contributing to greater gender equity in faculty positions.

· Quality: The faculty-student ratio has improved, and pass rates have steadily risen, indicating an enhancement in the quality of education.

These trends highlight ongoing challenges in access, equity, and quality, with particular attention needed for female representation and overall educational standards.

1. Impact on Quality of Education:

· Faculty Shortage and Student-Teacher Ratios: With no fresh recruitment, existing faculty members are often overburdened, leading to a decline in the student-teacher ratio. This negatively impacts student engagement, mentoring, and research supervision.

· Quality of Learning: Outdated teaching methodologies may persist, and innovative teaching practices might stagnate without the inflow of new, well-trained faculty members.

· Accreditation and Rankings: The quality of faculty is a major criterion in university rankings and accreditation. A consistent lack of recruitment can lead to a decline in rankings and accreditation status, making it harder for universities to attract quality students and funding.

2. Research and Innovation Bottlenecks:

· Stagnation in Research Output: The absence of fresh faculty, especially younger researchers who bring in new ideas and modern research methods, could severely hamper research innovation. This could reduce the university’s contributions to fields like science, technology, and social research.

· Limited Collaborations: New faculty often bring in fresh research collaborations, industry partnerships, and international networks. A lack of recruitment could isolate the university from global academic developments.

3. Equity and Access in Higher Education:

· Impact on Access: A faculty shortage often leads to fewer programs, limited course offerings, and reduced student intake. This especially affects marginalized and rural populations, who already face barriers in accessing higher education. This could exacerbate inequalities in higher education access.

· Rural and Remote Campuses: Many state universities in Telangana have satellite campuses in remote areas. These are the hardest hit by faculty shortages, leading to a decline in academic offerings and infrastructure.

4. Governance and Policy Gaps:

· Policy Inaction: The failure to recruit faculty over such a long period signals a governance crisis, where systemic bottlenecks in budgeting, approvals, and political will are evident. The article could examine specific policies or lack thereof that have contributed to this problem.

· Fiscal Constraints: While some argue that budgetary constraints might be the reason, this raises larger questions about the government’s prioritization of higher education in its development agenda.

5. Impact on Job Creation and Skill Development Decline in Academic Job Opportunities: The lack of faculty recruitment diminishes job prospects for PhD graduates and other highly qualified individuals, further impacting the state’s employment rates, especially in education and research sectors.

· Skills Gap: Universities are crucial in equipping students with the skills necessary to meet the demands of a modern workforce. A shrinking faculty body diminishes the ability of these institutions to develop industry-relevant curricula and innovative programs.

6. Student Perspectives:

· Student Dissatisfaction: Students are directly affected by the lack of qualified teachers, larger class sizes, and limited course options. High-performing students may choose to leave the state for better educational opportunities, further weakening the local talent pool.

· Brain Drain: With fewer opportunities at local universities, students may look elsewhere for higher education, contributing to a 'brain drain' that hurts the state's long-term intellectual capital.

7. Comparative Perspective:

· Comparison with Other States: How does Telangana fare compared to other states with similar socio-economic profiles? States that have invested in regular faculty recruitment might be showing better outcomes in terms of research, innovation, and student success. A comparative analysis could strengthen the argument.

8. Solutions and Path Forward:

· Policy Recommendations: The article could propose solutions such as immediate faculty recruitment drives, contractual hiring for specialized courses, collaboration with foreign universities, and online education programs to compensate for the shortage.

· Role of Technology: With advancements in online learning platforms, faculty shortages could be mitigated by integrating digital tools, but this requires investment and policy innovation.

· These points create a robust framework for an article that critically examines the impact of faculty shortages on the strength of universities in Telangana over the past decade. It could combine data, student testimonials, and expert opinions to give a well-rounded perspective

The challenges faced by universities in Telangana:

over the past 12 years (2012-2024) have been multifaceted, shaped by political, economic, and social factors, particularly in the context of the state’s formation in 2014. Managing these challenges has required various governmental strategies to ensure the smooth functioning of higher education institutions. Key challenges and government responses include:

1. Post-Bifurcation Adjustments (2014):

The bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh in 2014 posed significant challenges for universities in Telangana, especially concerning resource allocation, faculty redistribution, and infrastructure.

Telangana government focused on developing its own educational ecosystem, increasing budgetary allocations for higher education. They also emphasized establishing new institutions such as Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences and the transformation of Osmania University.

2. Funding Shortfalls:

Many state universities faced financial constraints due to inadequate funding, resulting in infrastructure deficiencies and delays in research projects. To counter these issues, the government has sought funds from central schemes like Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) and created specific policies to boost university research. However, limited fiscal space often constrained extensive funding initiatives.

3. Faculty Shortages:

Most universities in Telangana have struggled with vacancies in teaching positions. Lack of adequate faculty affected student outcomes and research output. The Telangana government periodically announced faculty recruitment drives and aimed to fill vacancies, but bureaucratic delays and hiring freezes often hindered the process. Efforts were made to recruit contract faculty to address immediate needs, but long-term challenges persist.

4. Access and Equity in Higher Education:

Despite several universities, regional imbalances and disparities in access to higher education have persisted, especially for marginalized groups, including students from rural areas, SC/ST categories, and economically weaker sections. Telangana implemented fee reimbursement schemes, and scholarships under the Telangana State Minorities Study Circle were expanded. In recent years, programs aimed at social equity, such as improving the hostel facilities and special quotas for marginalized students, were initiated.

5. Quality of Education and Accreditation:

Many universities in Telangana struggle to maintain high academic standards and secure good accreditation scores from agencies like NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council). The Telangana government encouraged institutions to upgrade their curriculum and align programs with national accreditation standards. The establishment of specific skill development initiatives (like Young India Skill University) also aligned with attempts to improve employability and skills, linking education to the job market.

6. Research and Innovation Deficits:

Universities in Telangana lag behind in research outputs and innovation compared to central institutions. Low research funding, inadequate facilities, and a lack of interdisciplinary programs were critical challenges. In an attempt to foster a research culture, the government has encouraged collaborations with industries and international institutions. Osmania University’s research collaborations with IT hubs in Hyderabad and the Telangana government’s focus on leveraging Hyderabad’s tech ecosystem to boost academic research are notable examples.

7. Digital and Infrastructure Gaps:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the shift to online learning exposed digital and infrastructure deficits. Many students from rural and underprivileged backgrounds lacked access to necessary technology and internet connectivity. The government rolled out initiatives to provide digital devices to students and improve online learning platforms. Programs like “Mana TV” aimed to bring online education to the masses, but large-scale adoption was limited.

8. Political Interference and Governance:

Universities in Telangana have faced issues related to political interference, affecting the autonomy and governance of these institutions. While successive governments have made attempts to introduce governance reforms, including autonomy for some institutions, political influence has continued to be a factor in administrative decisions. The government has also worked towards making appointments to key university positions more transparent, although challenges remain.

9. Student Unrest and Movements:

Universities in Telangana have witnessed student movements and unrest, especially related to reservations, fee hikes, and job opportunities post-education. The government has responded with schemes like the Telangana State Education and Employment Policy (T-SEEP), aimed at increasing employability through vocational training and skilling initiatives. Moreover, measures like dialogue with student unions and fee regulation frameworks have been employed to address grievances.

10. Focus on Skill Development:

Universities were criticized for focusing more on traditional academic streams rather than promoting skill-based education that could directly lead to employment. The establishment of skill universities, especially Young India Skill University, marked a shift towards promoting employability-focused programs, tying higher education with industry requirements, and creating green jobs.

In the context of higher education in Telangana, emerging challenges related to access, equity, and quality continue to shape the landscape, particularly as the sector strives to meet the growing aspirations of diverse communities. The key conclusions can be drawn from an analysis of these three critical dimensions:

1. Access: While Telangana has made significant strides in expanding access to higher education, especially with the establishment of new universities and colleges, there remain challenges for marginalized groups such as women, rural populations, and economically disadvantaged students. Issues like geographic disparity and limited access to digital resources persist, despite government initiatives aimed at bridging these gaps.

2. Equity: Ensuring equitable opportunities in higher education has been a policy priority, but disparities based on caste, gender, and socioeconomic status still exist. Scholarships, reservations, and targeted programs have helped increase participation among marginalized groups, yet there is a need for more comprehensive support systems. Ensuring that these students not only enter higher education but also succeed and graduate is an ongoing concern.

3. Quality: The rapid expansion of higher education institutions has raised concerns about the quality of education being delivered. Many state universities and colleges face challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, faculty shortages, and outdated curricula. Enhancing teacher training, improving research capacity, and adopting technology in pedagogy are critical to addressing the quality gap.

CONCLUSION:

Over the past 12 years, Telangana’s higher education system has navigated numerous challenges with varying degrees of success. The state government’s efforts to reform the sector, particularly through policy initiatives like fee reimbursement, recruitment drives, and digital learning programs, have helped mitigate some of the key issues. However, structural challenges funding, governance, quality of education, and equitable access remain persistent, requiring continued reforms and investment to foster a robust higher education environment in the state. This historical overview offers insight into how the Telangana government has responded to evolving challenges within its universities, balancing short-term needs and long-term educational goals. The challenges in Telangana's higher education sector around access, equity, and quality are interconnected and must be addressed holistically. While policies and programs have made a positive impact, structural inequalities remain. To overcome these challenges, there must be sustained efforts to ensure that all students, regardless of their background, have access to quality education that is inclusive and capable of preparing them for a rapidly evolving global economy. Collaboration between the state, educational institutions, and private sectors will be essential in driving reforms that can meet both regional and national goals for higher education.

REFERENCE:

1. Agarwal, P. (2009). Indian Higher Education: Envisioning the Future. SAGE Publications.

2. All India Survey on Higher Education 2021-22

3. Challenges ahead for TS Universities (thehansindia.com)

4. Govt. faces challenges in shifting “Illegally” admitted students in Guru Nanak and Sreenidhi Universities - The Hindu

5. https://aishe.gov.in/

6. https://hes.ficci.in/

7. https://www.ashe.ws/higheredreport

8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379759627_New_Education_Policy_2020_Major_Challenges_in_Telangana_State

9. MHRD (2016). National Policy on Education 2016: Committee for Evolution of the New Education Policy.

10. National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA) (2022). Annual Report 2021-22.

11. Planning Department, Government of Telangana (2021). Socio-Economic Outlook 2021.

12. Rani, G. Higher Education in India: Equity, Quality and Inclusion. Social Change. 2016; 46(4): 603-616.

13. State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT), Telangana (2020). Status of Higher Education in Telangana.

14. Sudhakar, G. Challenges in Higher Education in Telangana. Journal of Education and Practice. 2021; 12(3): 75-81.

15. Telangana State Council of Higher Education (TSCHE) (2020). Higher Education Policy Framework for Telangana.

16. Tilak, J.B.G. (2018). Higher Education, Public Good, and Markets. Routledge.

17. University Grants Commission (UGC) (2021). Annual Report 2020-21.

Received on 28.09.2024 Revised on 22.12.2024

Accepted on 28.02.2025 Published on 19.03.2025

Available online from March 28, 2025

Res. J. of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2025;16(1):45-52.

DOI: 10.52711/2321-5828.2025.00009

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.

Financial Year	Total Enrolment (in thousands)	Enrolment by Gender (Female)	Enrolment by Gender (Male)	Enrolment inProfessional Courses (in thousands)
2014-15	870	320	550	150
2015-16	920	340	580	160
2016-17	1,000	370	630	180
2017-18	1,100	400	700	200
2018-19	1,150	420	730	210
2019-20	1,200	450	750	220
2020-21	1,250	480	770	230
2021-22	1,300	500	800	240
2022-23	1,350	520	830	260

Financial Year	Gender Ratio (Female)	Female Faculty Percentage	Male Faculty Percentage
2014-15	0.58:1	30%	70%
2015-16	0.59:1	31%	69%
2016-17	0.59:1	32%	68%
2017-18	0.57:1	33%	67%
2018-19	0.57:1	34%	66%
2019-20	0.58:1	35%	65%
2020-21	0.62:1	36%	64%
2021-22	0.63:1	37%	63%
2022-23	0.63:1	38%	62%

Financial Year	Faculty-Student Ratio	Pass Rate (%)	Accreditation (% of Institutions)
2014-15	1:25	70%	40%
2015-16	1:24	72%	42%
2016-17	1:23	73%	45%
2017-18	1:22	75%	48%
2018-19	1:21	76%	50%
2019-20	1:20	78%	52%
2020-21	1:19	80%	55%
2021-22	1:18	82%	58%
2022-23	1:17	85%	60%